mailing list archives
RE: Interesting One
From: "Jimmy Liang" <jimmy () jimmyland com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:41:18 -0800
Interesting tho. How would the recovering software know if the data
you're retrieving comes from the 30th re-write, or the 29th?
You also have to consider that the data you're trying to recover isn't
the first data written to the disk.
So even if the atoms are not all aligned the right way, you wouldn't
know if that's because of the data from the 29th re-write, or the 30th.
From: Dan Darden [mailto:dld2517 () yahoo com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:35 PM
To: John Orr; security-basics () security-focus com
Subject: RE: Interesting One
Think atomically. There can be millions of atoms in a apace the size of
pin tip. A write head need not turn every atom in a layer of magnetic
material one way or the other. It only needs to turn just enough
one way in order for the read head to pick it up again. If we talk
layer of magnetic material that is just .0001" thick we are still
about layers upon layers upon layers (need I go on....) of atomic
It can be done!
Email dld2517 () yahoo com for your security
questions and information.
Hoax Info: http://hoaxbusters.ciac.org
"Everyday I beat my own personal record for
number of consecutive days I've stayed
alive" -- Author Unknown
From: John Orr [mailto:JOrr () austinbank com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 12:15 PM
To: dadams () johncrowley co uk; security-basics () security-focus com
Subject: Re: Interesting One
Personally, I think he is full of... hot air.
Bits are either "on" or "off", "1" or "0". If you change that pattern
(i.e. write over the same data area with a different sequence of bits),
the previous state of that field would not be determinable. Granted,
may be some residual magnetic field left on a particular area that is
"0" that had been "1", but the converse would not be true. There would
no residual field to read on an area that is now "1" that had been "0".
Sounds like sales fluff to me.
Anyway, that is my opinion, based on years of experience and a good
knowledge of physics.
jorr () austinbank com
"Dave Adams" <dadams () johncrowley co uk> 10/28/02 04:06PM >>>
I had an interesting conversation today with someone from FAST
Against Software Theft) They pretend not to be a snitch wing of the BSA.
Anyway, to get to the point, the guy that came to see me said that their
forensics guys could read data off a hard drive that had been written
up to thirty times. I find this very hard to believe and told him I
he was mistaken but the guy was adamant that it could be done. My
is, does anyone have any views on this, or, can anyone point me to a
of information where I can get the facts on exactly how much data can be
retrieved off a hard drive and under what conditions etc etc.
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer. Messages sent to and from
John Crowley (Maidstone) Ltd may be monitored.
Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, we do not accept
responsibility for any errors or omissions that are present in this
message, or any attachment, that have arisen as a result of e-mail
transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy
version. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of John Crowley (Maidstone) Ltd.