Home page logo

basics logo Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Biometric question
From: "Bryan E. Glancey" <bryan.glancey () epstechnology com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:41:25 -0600

Biometrics are tricky. One thing to think about it how to revoke users.
There are a lot of great companies that make the fingerprinting stuff
including ethentica and a lot of others.
        Try to pay close attention during your installation to the user

        AS to your question on how secure: the answer is the more secure
it is the bigger pain it is for your users. If you make it so that the
tolerance is not very high (your finger must be placed on the sensor
exactly the same way every time) it's pretty good - but then your users
may get frustrated with false refused log ins. If you set the system to
more tolerant modes (you can put your finger on 'close' to the same way
every time) there will be more false accepts but less log in refusals..
It's all a trade off.

Bryan Glancey
bryan.glancey () epstechnology com
Manager of Security Solutions
EPS Technology
999 Executive Parkway Drive 
St. Louis, MO 63141 USA
314-205-2303 fax

-----Original Message-----
From: Felix Cuello [mailto:felix () qodiga com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:27 PM
To: security-basics () security-focus com
Subject: Biometric question

Hello list!

   I will work in a project where phisical security will be based on
   biometrics, in fact only will be based on fingerprints biometric.

   How secure are fingerprints?, what biometric are more secure? (voice,
   eye, ??? what else).

   I'm not a security expert :-)

   Thanks a lot,

   [my english is bad... please sorry :-)]

Felix Cuello
felix () qodiga com

Av.Santa Fe 882 P.13 Of. "E"
C.P. ABP1059C
Tel.: (54) 011 - 4312-1698
Buenos Aires - Argentina

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]