mailing list archives
RE : VLAN Security
From: Bourque Daniel <Daniel.Bourque () loto-quebec com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 19:28:23 -0500
There should be no user traffic on the default/management vlan
This vlan propagate everywhere and is not prune.
De : Rich MacVarish [mailto:rmacvarish () killergeek com]
Envoyé : 7 février, 2003 10:14
À : Naman Latif
Cc : security-basics () securityfocus com
Objet : Re: VLAN Security
I don't know of any advantages (if someone does please share) of moving all
users to a non-default VLAN, but there may be an advantage to putting
different user groups onto different VLANs.
Example, putting Development and HR onto different VLANs essentially puts
them on seperate networks and prevents them from seeing each other. This is
a definate plus for security.
"Insert witty signature file here."
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Naman Latif wrote:
We have different Cisco Catalyst switches configured for VLANS. With
the current configuration
1. All trunks have a native VLAN, which is not used by any User. 2.
Management VLAN is other than VLAN 1.
We have different VLANs in place, however these are only used for
different Servers ,And all Users are only members of VLAN-1
Does it make sense to have all the user ports migrated to a Different
VLAN (other than VLAN 1) ? Is there a security advantage in this ?
Regards \\ Naman
- RE : VLAN Security Bourque Daniel (Feb 10)