|
Security Basics
mailing list archives
RE: TCP Syn Flooding
From: "Tim Laureska" <hometeam () goeaston net>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:16:37 -0500
The IRC programs pops up in a window when you start the NT box... you
can close it down easily enough.... but I'll be darned if I can find
where the program is
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Santerre [mailto:csanterre () MerchantsOverseas com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 2:08 PM
To: 'Steve Suehring'; Tim Laureska
Cc: security-basics
Subject: RE: TCP Syn Flooding
You mentioned an IRC program on the NT box. Is it still running or did
you
kill it? It could be trying to "phone home". Just another idea.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Suehring [mailto:sec () braingia org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 8:57 AM
To: Tim Laureska
Cc: security-basics
Subject: Re: TCP Syn Flooding
While I obviously can't guarantee it, I would sincerely doubt
that there
is a true syn flood taking place sourced in the doubleclick
network. What
were you doing at the time? Possibly surfing the web? Those
source and
destination ports look awfully like you were surfing the web and
doubleclick's side tried to open a connection to you for their load
balancing software.
My guess would be that the netgear is picking up a false positive.
Searching deja reveals that this may be the case after all:
http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&selm=an_523012517
Steve
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:20:46AM -0500, Tim Laureska wrote:
OK. I just installed a Netgear firewall box between a cable
modem and a
NT 4.0 server on a small network.. and set it up to email
me attempts at
security breaches. I am brand new to these devices and a relative
neophyte to internet/internal network security. So the question is
this.
I received this message a few times yesterday after I
installed the box:
Fri, 02/14/2003 20:35:01 - TCP connection dropped -
Source:205.138.3.201, 80, WAN - Destination:69.2.167.25,
20306, LAN -
'TCP:Syn Flooding' End of Log ----------
What should I make of this?
T.
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- RE: TCP Syn Flooding, (continued)
|