Home page logo
/

basics logo Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Samba
From: "Depp, Dennis M." <deppdm () ornl gov>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 15:06:49 -0500

Not sure as I don't consider SAMBA to have a lot of security concerns.
I would also look at who has security concerns with SAMBA.  If it is a
Windows Admin, I would be skeptical.  If it is a Unix admin I would
listen more closely.  Keep in mind the older versions only support
NTLMv2 and if it is not configured properly, it could use NTLM.  I'm not
sure if the new versions are setup to use Kerberos or not.  I'm also not
sure if the SAMBA server updates its password when used with a Windows
domain or not.  SAMBA is probably more secure than many of the NAS
devices that are currently available, particularly the ones running a
proprietary OS.

Denny

-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Solomon [mailto:solzjack43 () hotmail com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 10:17 AM
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Samba


what are the security concerns over Samba?  Someone told me that its a
real 
bad idea security-wise but noone can tell me why...


Jack

_________________________________________________________________
Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger


------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
  • Samba Jack Solomon (Nov 27)
    • <Possible follow-ups>
    • RE: Samba Depp, Dennis M. (Nov 27)
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault