Home page logo

basics logo Security Basics mailing list archives

Re: military strike possible?
From: Barry Fitzgerald <bkfsec () sdf lonestar org>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:08:08 -0500

Meritt James wrote:

First and foremost, how do you attack someone when they:

A) Haven't done the deed and thus, are unidentified?


B) Haven't done the deed and, by any sane measure of justice, are not
guilty of anything?

Guess that you haven't been looking at the international news much. That does not appear to be a major concern. Or perhaps you are merely
unaware of the massive number of "collateral damage" cases?  Or perhaps
unaware of the "mutual interference" problem?

Your "first and foremost" appears mostly irrelevant in reality.  But it
does make a nice dreamworld, though.

How is it irrelivant?

You can't attack someone if you can't identify your target. How is it defensive if the attacker has not yet committed an offense? I'm not saying that it we don't do exactly that - we do and I think it's absolute bunk that we do it and I hate the fact that we do it. It's a travesty that can't be called justice under ANY rational definition. But, we shouldn't justify unjust pre-emptive strike simply because we'd do it anyway. My two "first and foremosts" were basic requirements of tactics and justice. No matter how much we choose to ignore them, they will ALWAYS be relevant.


The Presidio integrates PGP data encryption and XML Web Services security to simplify the management and deployment of PGP and reduce overall PGP costs by up to 80%. FREE WHITEPAPER & 30 Day Trial - http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/ForumSystems_security-basics_031027 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]