|
Security Basics
mailing list archives
Patching
From: Alessandro Bottonelli <abottonelli () libero it>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 10:12:29 +0200
A thought has been crossing my mind for a long time, I'd like to confront it
with the list.
In the "old days" a patch and/or fix was defined as "something that closes a
known hole and opens ten unknown holes" :-) Yet, literature and common
practices keep saying we should maintain our systems and network appliances
up to date with the last patches / software releases.
WHY should I feel safer that way? How can I tell Rev. 1.3 is any better
(security-wise) than Rev. 1.2 ? Is the cost (financial and others) of change
management worth it? If so, how can I measure such worthness?
Too much caffeine on a rainy Monday morning, in usually sunny Italy? :-)
--
Alessandro Bottonelli
www.axis-net.it
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FREE Whitepaper: Better Management for Network Security
Looking for a better way to manage your IP security?
Learn how Solsoft can help you:
- Ensure robust IP security through policy-based management
- Make firewall, VPN, and NAT rules interoperable across heterogeneous
networks
- Quickly respond to network events from a central console
Download our FREE whitepaper at:
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/Solsoft_security-basics_031015
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Patching Alessandro Bottonelli (Oct 20)
|