Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




basics logo Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Security Certs
From: "Nelson, Ernie" <Ernie.Nelson () wizards com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 10:41:26 -0700

I finished my GSEC in January, and it was one of the more rigorous certification processes I've been through.  I've 
just finished my GCIH training and am about to begin the actual certification process....involving writing a nice paper 
explaining an attack in detail and then the incident handling process from start to finish.  Then comes the actual 
tests.  This is much closer to the performance based testing model like what is used by Red Hat for the RHCT (which I 
just started training for) and RHCE than the simple take a test only method like most Microsoft certs.

As far as a possible job candidates claims and certifications...
In the end I believe it is far better to actually evaluate the persons knowledge the best you can with the time and 
resources given than to simply accept the claims and acronyms as proof.  Also as David Gillett posted earlier, it can 
show that they have devoted the time and money to achieve certification which is what many employers do when they 
evaluate your college education.

Ernie - GSEC, MCP (and hopefully soon RHCT, GCIH)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]