Gee, why not just block ALL email communication. That would save you
some work too.
Archive files are a necessary part of communication and very beneficial
in saving bandwidth.
Let's have a reality check ....
David J O'Neill
Senior Systems Analyst
State of Oregon
Department of Human Services
Office of Information Services
PH# 503.378.2101 ext. 280
email david.j.oneill_at_state.or.us
>>> Jonathan Loh <kj6loh_at_yahoo.com> 03/14/05 02:21PM >>>
Ok that's a solution. But what I want to ask you is this. How much
overhead
does it take to do this? Blocking archive files would be an easier
method with
little overhead. Possibly with a reply to sender that your site does
not
accept archive files.
--- Kinnell <kinnell.t_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On the network I'm a member of we block all exe files sent inside
the
> rar or zip, so even if it is sent the file will be 0byted. Wouldn't
> that be a better method? otherwise if you block all bz2, zip, rar,
> etc... then you will block a lot of useful communication
>
> -Kinnell
>
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:49:16 -0500, adisegna_at_siscocorp.com
> <adisegna_at_siscocorp.com> wrote:
> > Sean, I have to disagree with you. Any file that that can
encapsulate an
> > executable file should be blocked (IMO). ZIP files are one of the
> > biggest carriers of malicious content these days. I don't make it
a
> > habbit of trusting my users no matter how many times they get
trained.
> > RAR extraction tools are not part of the software image policy on
my
> > network so users are oblivious to the file blocking. What is your
> > solution?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > AD
> > Information Technology Group
> > Security Identification Systems Corporation
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sean Crawford [mailto:sean01_at_accnet.com.au]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 9:39 PM
> > To: security-basics_at_securityfocus.com
> > Subject: RE: 543.rar attachment
> >
> > ---> -----Original Message-----
> > ---> From: adisegna_at_siscocorp.com [mailto:adisegna_at_siscocorp.com]
> >
> > ---> Subject: RE: 543.rar attachment
> >
> > ---> I just recently got the same executable inside .rar. I
extracted
> > the
> > ---> dddd.exe and ran a scan on it. Norton Corporate 9.01 didn't
find
> > ---> anything (as of 4 days ago). I wasn't about to double click
this
> > exe on
> > ---> my corporate network. Block the rar extension on your mail
server.
> > --->
> >
> > rar is a valid compression format...blocking it isn't a very good
> > solution.
> >
> > 2 cents.
> >
> > Sean
> >
> >
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
Received on Mar 15 2005
Intro
