Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Security Basics: Re: Hashing Functions

Re: Hashing Functions

From: Steven DeFord <security.willworker_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:39:47 -0800

Although, after reading the linked-to paper, they haven't really said
much of anything other than "We did it!"

So I retract my (implied) claim that details have been published.

Apologies
Steve

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:27:14 -0800, Steven DeFord
<security.willworker_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:14:06 -0500, Micheal Espinola Jr
> <michealespinola_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Has it definitively been broken? I know I have read reports that it
>
> Bruce Schneier's blog post about the collision attack:
> http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html
>
> The paper itself:
> http://theory.csail.mit.edu/~yiqun/shanote.pdf
>
> --
> Steven DeFord
> Security.Willworker_at_gmail.com
> (925) 596-0426
>

-- 
Steven DeFord
Security.Willworker_at_gmail.com
(925) 596-0426
Received on Mar 29 2005
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]