Actually,
F-Secure uses both Kaspersky and F-Prot AV engines and licensed Lavasoft's
AdAware for Anti-Spyware.
The suite works quite well and I've yet to have anything get past it...
As to ZDNet, I take most of their reviews with a grain of salt...they're
kind of like a gun magazine, a lot of fluff and not a lot of grit.
I haven't used the corporate implementation of F-Secure in a long time,
but the home user Internet Security Suite seems to be thorough...but then,
it did take a little time and attention to make sure I had it configured
how I wanted.
F-Prot still makes it's own AV...it's very meat and potatoes, not at all
fancy. But it works and it's cheap $25 for five licenses or something.
Sincerely,
Bryan S. Sampsel
LibertyActivist.org
Lance.Druger_at_wellsfargo.com wrote:
> The f-secure suite uses Kaspersky's av engine and two in house engines.
> ZD-net wasn't too thrilled with the product and supposedly found some
> holes, but the user's base seems to like it.
>
> http://reviews-zdnet.com.com/Kaspersky_Anti_Hacker/4505-3513_16-20814684
> .html
>
>
> Lance Druger
> (925) 674-7314
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Chong [mailto:andrewjw_at_singnet.com.sg]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 2:30 PM
> To: 'Chris Hunhoff'; security-basics_at_securityfocus.com
> Subject: RE: Software Firewalls
>
>
> I've been using Kaspersky lab personal security suite for virus,
> spyware, adwares, worms prevention.
>
> http://www.sweetfantasy.biz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=11&PN=1
>
> Regards,
> Andrew Chong, CISSP
> (http://www.sweetfantasy.biz)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Hunhoff [mailto:chunhoff_at_eastriver.coop]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 3:18 AM
> To: security-basics_at_securityfocus.com
> Subject: RE: Software Firewalls
>
>
> My personal favorite is:
>
> http://www.tinysoftware.com/home/tiny2?la=EN
>
> I have been using and recommending it for a couple of years and I have
> yet to hear a complaint.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve.Cummings_at_barclayscapital.com
> [mailto:Steve.Cummings_at_barclayscapital.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 1:00 PM
> To: Lance.Druger_at_wellsfargo.com; security-basics_at_securityfocus.com
> Subject: Re: Software Firewalls
>
> Hmm only two I can recommend
>
> Mcaffe I think is called
> Esm or iss desktop protector
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lance.Druger_at_wellsfargo.com <Lance.Druger_at_wellsfargo.com>
> To: security-basics_at_securityfocus.com
> <security-basics_at_securityfocus.com>
> Sent: Thu Sep 22 20:35:29 2005
> Subject: Software Firewalls
>
> I'm personally (not the company I work for) looking for a new software
> firewall. I was using Sygate as it has an active IPS and excellent
> logging, but it was purchased by Norton and has been discontinued.
>
> - Zonalarm - 6.0 is unstable and lacks an IPS and the OS firewall slows
> the PC down, and creates shutdown delays of over 2 minutes on a virgin
> install of Windows
>
> - Norton tends to litter the registry, but feature wise may be the best
> option.
>
> - Kerio has ceased development
>
> I have a NAT router, but really need a software firewall (paid is fine)
> with the following features:
>
> Required:
> Windows XP Compatible
> IPS - unattended active shunning of users that attempt hacking activity
> Does not slow traffic significantly Bi-directional Actively being
> improved/updated Advanced rule creation A decent (but not completely
> intuitive) interface Program access control (preferably w/ MD5 hash) A
> minimal IDS (logging suspicious activity) Resistant to various "leak
> test" type attacks
>
> Desirable:
> Small memory footprint
> Clean uninstall
>
>
> Any recommendations or experience with the Norton product would be
> greatly appreciated?
>
> Lance Druger
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.4/109 - Release Date:
> 9/21/2005
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> For more information about Barclays Capital, please
> visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.
>
>
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays
> Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
> message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes,
> it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is
> caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are
> solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
>
> Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays
> Group for operational or business reasons.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Received on Oct 03 2005
Intro
