Home page logo

basics logo Security Basics mailing list archives

Re: ADS Password Storage Protection
From: "Gregory Rubin" <grrubin () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 14:43:22 -0700

Hash: SHA1

While I agree that length is far superior to complexity, I must
disagree that 15 char is sufficient.

(Pure theory to follow)
Each additional letter in English provides approximately 1.1 bits of
entropy.  Even grossly overestimating this at 2 bits, the total
entropy of a 15 char passphrase is only 30 bits or the equivelent of a
complex password of length 3 to 4.  Thus, the passphrase remains
vulnerable to dictionary attacks.

For secure systems, the user should type a sentance.  That will easily
provide around 20 or more characters.  At that length, the entropy at
the word level (as opposed to just the letter) starts to really come
into play and the pass phrase becomes secure.  For administrators, it
doesn't even need to be much longer, but they could throw in a little
complexity as they are likely to be more competant.

For low security systems, the users are going to pick weak stuff no
matter what, so is it worth the added inconvience?


P.S. Signed with a 40+ char pass-phrase.
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32) - WinPT 0.11.9


This list is sponsored by: SensePost

Hacking, like any art, will take years of dedicated study and practice to master. We can't teach you to hack. But we can teach you what we've learned so far. Our courses are honest, real, technical and practical. SensePost willl be at Black Hat Vegas in July. To see what we're about, visit us at:

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]