|
Security Basics
mailing list archives
RE: RDP Security
From: "Bryan Ponnwitz" <bponnwitz () wwsport com>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 15:56:36 -0400
I believe Microsoft's answer to MITM attacks on a local LAN is to
implement IPSec on your computers. If you implement the correct IPSec
policy, then I would say that RDP would be 100% secure. Even if you
don't want to turn on IPSec for your whole LAN, you could create a
policy to sign traffic on port 3389 between the computers that you're
RDP'ing with and it would eliminate the possibility of MITM attacks
completely.
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com]
On Behalf Of Tornado
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 6:37 AM
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: RDP Security
Hi All,
I was just curious to know how secure is Remote Desktop Protocol on the
local network? I know that this protocol is prone to MITM attacks.But
has
Microsoft addressed this issue in the latest RDP client?
Thanks in advance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Click for FHA loan, $0 lender fees, low rates & approvals nationwide
http://tags.bluebottle.com/fc/CAaCMPJetxFHQmpYDjxn9T2dV7G9wZV0/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: RDP Security, (continued)
RE: RDP Security Bryan Ponnwitz (Mar 12)
Re: Re: RDP Security alegr1 (Mar 07)
|