mailing list archives
RE: NAT external/Public IP
From: Jason Alexander <jalexander () plus net>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:28:13 +0100
If its not a security risk then why is it a PCI requirement?
From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
Sent: 25 October 2007 15:49
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: NAT external/Public IP
On 2007-10-25 crazy frog crazy frog wrote:
On 24 Oct 2007 15:46:21 -0000, smarts_buy () yahoo com wrote:
Would like know is ther any security concern to bring in
external/public IP with out NAT to inside of the enterprise network.
Is it any way more secure if we use NAT?
2)If you allow lots of machine to direct access the internet with
external ip they may pose a security risk.
How would that pose a risk that would not exist with NAT'ed machines?
"All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches becoming available."
--Jason Coombs on Bugtraq