Home page logo

basics logo Security Basics mailing list archives

RE: Napster vs. ITunes.. Which is more secure?
From: "Campa, Albert R." <Albert.Campa () va gov>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 09:41:56 -0500

I would take a look at where the vulnerabilities are. I have seen Itunes
vulnerabilities popup and not so much napster, but that is probably
because Itunes is more prevalent.

I personally wouldn't permit neither product. Why allow 3 vulnerable
capable apps, when you just can have one, in Windows Media Player? Then
again, why have that one either? 

Albert R. Campa

-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com]
On Behalf Of desert penguin
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 12:27 PM
To: security-basics () securityfocus com
Subject: Napster vs. ITunes.. Which is more secure?

Greetings all,

Have begun a cleanup on a network in which many PCs were found to have
iTunes, Napster and some other P2P programs which are obviously "no
I am leaning more towards allowing Windows Media player and iTunes, but
what about Napster?  Now that they are legalized, are there insecurities
with it- or is it pretty much on the same "level" as iTunes?  Is it good
policy to allow WMP and iTunes and disallow Napster and say, BearShare,
or would it be best to just restrict them all entirely?  Thank You

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]