|
Bugtraq
mailing list archives
Re: finger-bombing
From: chowes () helix net (Charles Howes)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 1994 20:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 13 Oct 1994, James Seng wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 1994, Christopher Klaus wrote:
Contact the admins of those hosts and tell them to have it stopped.
Also, modify inetd.conf and comment out finger and kill -HUP inetd
to restart it.
A question which is not really relvant to this mailing-list..What if the
admin is the one who is guilty of such attack? (attack here refers to
more general case than just fingering) Who do i inform or do i have to
deal it myself? :-)
Fortunately, there is always a course of action.
For any site, if you can't get satisfaction, you can go up the chain of
command until you *do* get satisfaction.
Universities, companies, and others are on the net for a reason, and
usually want to be good neighbours. University and company presidents
are usually quite responsive if their subordinates are causing
problems.
And, if the president is causing a problem, there's a network provider
that can always be approached.
If *that* fails to satisfy you, you can either take it to usenet, or
decide you were wrong. Sometimes both. :-)
As to the original question, would creating a fifo called .plan be
good or bad? It would freeze finger requests as they were made,
allowing a more casual tracing, but risks overflowing some kernel
table?
Also, if it is being done indirectly (finger user () yourhost@host1), ask
the folks at host1 if they could keep logs of finger requests, as well
as put in the ident service. (Tcp wrappers, pidentd and syslog.)
ObBug: the C2conv program on SunOS 4.1.3 seemed to have dumped garbage
over part of our password file when we tried it the other day. The
syslog for auth.info exploded as a result. It's almost as secure as
dumping the computer into wet cement, and takes less time. How *do*
you set up shadow passwords, anyway?
ObBug2: I was talk-bombed the other day. You can modify a talk
program to send escape sequences in the talk request, messing up the
recipient's screen. Since it's UDP, finding the culprit is not
possible with tcpd. Anyone have a solution?
--
Charles Howes -- chowes () helix net
Always tell the truth, then you make it the other bloke's problem!
- Sean Connery, 1971
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|