|
Bugtraq
mailing list archives
Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-22.UNIX.syslog.2-Aug-1995
From: goetz () open ch (Goetz von Escher)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 23:54:42 -0600
On Sep 19, 4:33pm, Sten Gunterberg wrote:
There's no patch yet, but Sun is apparently working on one. The Bug-IDs
are 1219835 for Solaris 1.x (SunOS 4.x) and 1220257 for Solaris 2.x.
Try to give those to local Sun support and see what happens :-)
Solaris 2.x ??? - I thought this is a BSD problem? Are you telling
me that *all* my Solaris boxes are vulnerable too?
Also local Sun support told me that the patch for Bug 1219835 has been
integrated into SunOS 4.1.4 and there probably won't be a patch for
older versions! Here's the bug info they sent me:
Bug Id: 1219835
Product: sunos
Category: utility
Subcategory: other
Release summary: 4.1.3, 4.1.4, 4.1.3_U1, 4.1
Bug/Rfe: bug
State: integrated
But now I'm really getting confused when I read the mail by Andy Cowley
who said:
On Sep 19, 4:17pm, andy () btc uwe ac uk wrote:
- Is Sun working on a patch?
yes."
I have this problem logged with Sun. the latest (12:03 BST 19 Sept 95)
is that T (test?)
patches are available to existing fault call owners. If the problem
is severe for you persuade Sun to send them. They are :-
4.1.3_U1 domestic libc = T101759-04
4.1.3_U1 international libc = T101558-07
4.1.4 domestic libc = T102544-03
4.1.4 international libc = T102545-03
These are betas and Sun will expect testing and a report.
So why would there be a test patch for SunOS 4.1.4 if it was fixed
in that release? I guess one of you guys is wrong.
-Goetz
--
Goetz von Escher email: Goetz.von-Escher () Open CH
Open Systems AG voice: +41 (61) 262-0505
Petersplatz 12 FAX: +41 (61) 262-0510
CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: [8lgm]-Advisory-22.UNIX.syslog.2-Aug-1995, (continued)
|