Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Bugtraq: Re: at the risk of another flamefest..

Re: at the risk of another flamefest..

From: Alan L. Wendt <alan_at_ez0.ezlink.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 00:37:37 -0600

>
> If I may fan the flames further... I often wonder if we should blame
> our Language of Choice, rather than bad programming practice. It
> seems to me that the bulk of code-based security problems these days
> are buffer overflow-related. Is this characteristic of poor coding,
> or a misfeature of C?
>

I would vote for the standard library calls. A library function that
accepts a pointer to a buffer area that is going to get written into,
without requiring a size parameter, is a travesty of two mockeries of a sham.

Alan
Received on Jul 16 1996

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos