Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: Buffer Overflows: A Summary
From: spaf () CS PURDUE EDU (Gene Spafford)
Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 15:04:33 -0500


Bill Trost <trost () CLOUD RAIN COM> wrote:

Oddly enough, we had a talk here in the CS department earlier this
week by Mootaz Elnozahy from Carnegie Mellon who suggested the idea of
writing a system call pattern associated with a security sensitive
program.  The pattern would specify which calls would be used, with
what arguments, and in what order, etc.  The kernel could check the
program's execution, and if the kernel detects a problem, it drops the
program into a secure mode where the attacker continues to get
responses like the attack is succeeding, but can't actually do any
damage.

Mr. Elnozahy should look at the literature more carefully.  Stephanie Forrest
has been working on something almost exactly like this for the past couple of
years.  A paper on the work was in the last Oakland IEEE Symposium on
Security and Privacy.  The work has continued, and they have more interesting
results.

There is also some history of techniques similar to this used in deployed
intrusion detection systems.....

--spaf



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]