Home page logo
/

bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: nestea v2 against freebsd 3.0-Release
From: aleph1 () DFW NET (Aleph One)
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 11:03:17 -0600


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:33:30 -0800
From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis () tsc tdk com>
To: Fedor Gubarev <Fedor.Gubarev () itep ru>,
    freebsd-security () FreeBSD ORG
Subject: Re: nestea v2 against freebsd 3.0-Release

On Oct 27,  9:46am, Fedor Gubarev wrote:
} Subject: Re: nestea v2 against freebsd 3.0-Release
}
} I wonder why there is no response at all on this mail.
} It seems a little bit surprising at least.....

I posted a couple of potential patches for this to the -current
list about 24 and 48 hours ago.  The following is the first patch
(the second has the same fix plus some optimization).

--- ip_input.c.orig     Fri Oct 23 02:17:19 1998
+++ ip_input.c  Sun Oct 25 01:50:20 1998
@@ -750,7 +750,7 @@
         * if they are completely covered, dequeue them.
         */
        for (; q != NULL && ip->ip_off + ip->ip_len > GETIP(q)->ip_off;
-            p = q, q = nq) {
+            q = nq) {
                i = (ip->ip_off + ip->ip_len) -
                    GETIP(q)->ip_off;
                if (i < GETIP(q)->ip_len) {


} On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, Gilles Bruno <Gilles.Bruno () ujf-grenoble fr>
} wrote:
}
} > Hi everyone,
} > we tested yesterday the old nestea v2 against a brand new
} > 3.0-Release : it has prooved to be effective against it
} > (the box rebooted - invalid page fault while in kernel
} > mode). The same test against 2.2.[6,7]-Release didn't harm
} > at all.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo () FreeBSD org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message



  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault