|
Bugtraq
mailing list archives
Re: Chasing bugs / vulnerabilties
From: Kurt Seifried <listuser () seifried org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:59:48 -0600
Amen.
[snipsnip]
Both white box (known source and specifications) and black box (using
documetation for software without knowing the internals) testing should be
carried out - by individuals separate and apart from the coders.
Try the UNIX Fuzz experiment, first conducted at the University of
Wisconsin
on multiple UNIX operating systems and when tried again several years
later
revealed only slightly better results (the Fuzz experiment throws garbage
input on the command line into a program and tests the response). We
(check out
http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/coast/ms_penetration_testing/v11.html) tried
the same experiment on WinNT with 'interesting' results.
Fuzz for Linux:
http://fuzz.sourceforge.net/
Secure programming documentation and software (several links).
http://www.securityportal.com/lskb/articles/kben10000082.html
ITS4
http://www.rstcorp.com/its4/
SLINT
http://www.l0pht.com/products.html#SLINT
Michael S Hines, CISA,CIA,CFE,CDP | Phone 765.494.5338
Kurt Seifried
SecurityPortal, your focal point for security on the net
http://www.securityportal.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
S21SEC-003: Vulnerabilities in CommuniGate Pro v3.2.4 Lluis Mora (Jul 17)
|