|
Bugtraq
mailing list archives
Re: ftpd: the advisory version
From: djb () CR YP TO (D. J. Bernstein)
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:20:14 -0000
monti writes:
*allowing* other than src-20 active data connections through a firewall,
Why are you allowing PORT-style FTP through your firewall? See RFC 1579.
Can I scan port 6000 on your hosts if I set my source port to 20?
Netscape uses PASV. The OpenBSD ftp client uses PASV. The Linux ftp
client uses PASV if you give it the -p option. Internet Explorer uses
PASV. What makes you think that requiring PASV will noticeably increase
the level of user annoyance at your firewall?
---Dan
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Conclusion to recent working WuFTPD Exploits, (continued)
|