mailing list archives
Re: Disk (over)quota in Windows 2000
From: dknight () CSUCHICO EDU (Bret Piatt)
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 08:10:45 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Gutmann" <pgut001 () cs auckland ac nz>
To: <BUGTRAQ () SECURITYFOCUS COM>
Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: Disk (over)quota in Windows 2000
Dave Tarbatt - ACS <D.A.Tarbatt () BOLTON AC UK> writes:
I've been looking into disk quotas under Windows 2000 and have uncovered
few anomalies. On top of a few peculiarities there appears to be a bug
allows a user to exceed their disk quota by as much as they wish.
I discovered by experiment that new files can be created upto a size of
(Quota - UsedSpace + 2KB - 1byte), i.e. they can go overquota by up to
bytes. Not too much of a problem. Extending existing files can be up to
(Quota - UsedSpace +1KB -1byte) i.e. up to 1023 bytes overquota - nothing
much to be worried about.
Isn't this just a cluster-size filling issue? It looks like accounting is
being done on a bytes-used basis but files are managed on a per-cluster
so it's possible to extend files out to fill the cluster without coming
conflict with the quota system.
This makes it any less of a bug how? The main issue here isn't the fact
he can stretch the files up to X bytes its the fact that he can keep
files when he's already exceeded his quota because 0 byte files still take
up 1 block on the disk (512 bytes based on the NTFS system). The Win2k
quota system should count each file a user creates at that minimum size
even if the size is actually smaller. This will not change how the normal
user works but will deny this attack and allow for more accurate accounting.
Bret Piatt - bpiatt () flash net/dknight () csuchico edu
Systems Engineer [CCNA/CCDA/MCP]
PacifiCom - (530) 342-8999