<a href="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=clk&zid=14678&wd=728&ht=90&pair=as" target="_top"><img style="border:0px;" src="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=img&zid=14678&wd=728&ht=90&pair=as" alt="i" width="728" height="90"/></a>

Nmap Security Scanner

Docs
Security Lists

Full Disclosure

More
Security Tools

Packet crafters

More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:

edgeos

Bugtraq: Re: Future of buffer overflows ?

Re: Future of buffer overflows ?

From: Darren Reed <avalon_at_COOMBS.ANU.EDU.AU>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:04:46 +1100

Until trampolines are made redundant in gcc/g++, we cannot universally
disable execution on writeable pages.
Received on Nov 03 2000

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: alex medvedev: "dos on quake1 servers"
Previous message: Georgi Guninski: "Lame cross site scripting against www.ibm.com"
Maybe in reply to: Granquist, Lamont: "Re: Future of buffer overflows ?"
Next in thread: Michal Zalewski: "Re: Future of buffer overflows ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]