Home page logo

bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: Trend Micro's VirusWall: Multiple vunerabilities (fwd)
From: Joey Maier <maierj () HOME COM>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 15:53:20 +0000

On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Hank Leininger wrote:

Hm.  Joey's advisory listed a number of @trendmicro.com addresses he had
sent notifications to.  He did not mention that the most obviously
appropriate of those had bounced :(

Hank Leininger <hlein () progressive-comp com>

Hey Hank,  (...and other folks)

The address that currently works for TrendMicro is
support () trendmicro com   For the fastest response, include the
Case ID # in the subject line.  For this issue, that's [TDSC237EA95D].

Sorry I didn't mention which addresses bounced and which did not.
I was following the recommendations in RFPolicyV2, which states:
Should the ORIGINATOR not be able to locate a suitable email address
for the MAINTAINER, the ORIGINATOR should address the ISSUE to:

security-alert () [MAINTAINER]
secure () [MAINTAINER]
security () [MAINTAINER]
support () [MAINTAINER]
info () [MAINTAINER]

regardless of their existence. Anyone who could be deemed as a
'MAINTAINER' is encouraged to populate at least some of the above
email addresses.

I agree that TrendMicro ought to establish a security () trendmicro com
account and route that to someone other than their general support

        "When you understand UNIX, you will understand the world.
         When you understand NT....you will understand NT" - Richard Thieme
http://www.slothnet.com - is currently unavailable :(

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
  • Re: Trend Micro's VirusWall: Multiple vunerabilities (fwd) Joey Maier (Jan 16)
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]