Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: TCP Timestamping and Remotely gathering uptime information
From: bert hubert <ahu () DS9A NL>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 19:48:23 +0100

On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 12:31:22AM +0000, Stephen White wrote:
On Wed, Mar, 2001, Bret wrote:
either by creating a new 'timestamp clock' for
each TCP session (that uses timestamps)

You can't do this .. it breaks the use of such timestamps for things
like TCP Sequence number wrap-around protection on fast networks
(gigabit).

Yes you can. PAWS is not needed to differentiate *different* sessions,
unless you also cycle through all your local ports in a few seconds. Which
is exceedingly unlikely.

Regards,

bert hubert

--
http://www.PowerDNS.com      Versatile DNS Services
Trilab                       The Technology People
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]