Bugtraq: Re: Cisco HSRP Weakness/DoS

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () RESEARCH ATT COM>]

In message <200105031757.TAA05508 () ns wcd se>, bashis writes:
> --%--multipart-mixed-boundary-1.5498.988912661--%
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Hi
>
> I was playing with Cisco's HSRP (Hot Standby Routing Protocol),
> and there is a (major) weakness in that protocol that allow
> any host in a LAN segment to make a HSRP DoS.
>
> Short (very) explain of HSRP.
> HSRP uses UDP on port 1985 to multicast address 224.0.0.2,
> and the authentication is in clear text. (default: cisco)
>
> I include a small program that sends out a fake HSRP packet,
> when it hear a legal HSRP packet, as a "proof of concept" code...
>
> Vendor was notified about this 14 April 2001,,
> and their response was to use HSRP with IPSec.
> http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw00/pres/2402.pdf
Their response was precisely correct.  Given the evils that can be done
with ARP-spoofing, this sort of misbehavior by someone already on the
LAN can't easily be prevented.

More generally, have a look at RFC 2338, on VRRP -- the Virtual Router
Redundancy Protocol.  VRRP is the standards-track replacement for HSRP.
The Security Considerations section explains when to use each type of
authentication, up to and including IPsec.

Cisco's real mistake is in having a common default authentication word
-- not because it's a security failure, but because it can no longer
fulfill its function of guarding against configuration errors.

                --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb