Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: IPv4 mapped address considered harmful
From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd () suespammers org>
Date: 27 Aug 2002 00:18:28 -0400

On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 12:18, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote: 

This ambiguity creates chances to malicious party to trick victim nodes.
Here are a couple of examples:

How are these any different than with IPv4? I can send bad source
addresses in IPv4 just as easily as in IPv6. IPv6 might even make it
easier to do, e.g., reverse-path filtering (less prefixes to worry
about).

Any kernel that takes a packet saying it is from the local host
off the wire is broken.

Any firewall that allows through a packet from the Internet saying
it is from the LAN is broken.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]