mailing list archives
Re: ZLib double free bug: Windows NT potentially unaffected
From: Martijn Lievaart <m () rtij nl>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:15:37 +0100
Robert Collins wrote:
From: KJK::Hyperion [mailto:noog () libero it]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 4:52 AM
To: bugtraq () securityfocus com
Subject: ZLib double free bug: Windows NT potentially unaffected
I allocate 4 kb of memory, then I free the block twice. Under
this program will emit the following diagnostic message:
HEAP[testheap.exe]: Invalid Address specified to RtlFreeHeap(
130000, 1357f0 )
immediately after this, a breakpoint exception (code
0x80000003) is raised.
So, apparently, the second free operation degrades
without any corruption of in-memory structures, since the subsequent
allocation/deallocation runs fine
Can I suggest you try it with a non-debug build. I've seen heap
corruption occur in winNT software, that in debug-builds was trapped,
but in non-debug builds was not.
Actually, this is one of the big differences between debug and non-debug
builds with MSVC. Note the name of the routine above, it is
RtlFreeHeap. This is the MSVC RTL, not WindowsNT memory management.
The MSVC debug builds check for heap corruption on all heap operations,
as demonstrated above. Non-debug builds don't check, they just assume
that everything is valid. In this case, the pointer passed to free is
/not/ valid, which only the debug build will catch. The non-debug build
could do anything, most likely crash, but almost equally likely it runs
as if there was no bug.
I'm not sure this would be exploitable though.