Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: An Alternate View of Recently Reported PHP Vulnerabilities
From: dullien () gmx de
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 09:22:37 +0200

Hey Steven , all,

SMC> How many people who audit PHP applications verify that the second
SMC> argument to str_repeat() is valid?

Nobody, because the misbehaviour of this given function is a _bug_ and
thus not documented. Without documenting the valid input ranges, there
can be no "validation", only "guessing that this is now valid".

SMC> How many otherwise innocent functions in PHP can have unexpected
SMC> results if an attacker can control one of the parameters?

Expect the same to hold true for almost any other language. The libc's
these days are relatively "bug-free", but the libraries of PHP etc.
have not undergone the same amount of auditing.

SMC> And maybe entire classes of vulnerabilities that are assumed to be
SMC> specific to a particular language, aren't.

Any vulnerability existing in C is very likely going to occur in other
languages which (in the end) chain down to C-like code.

Cheers,
dullien
PS: Let us please just keep the entire Java discussion out of this :)


-- 
Mit freundlichen GrĂ¼ssen
dullien () gmx de                            mailto:dullien () gmx de


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]