Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re[2]: A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?
From: Marius Huse Jacobsen <mahuja () c2i net>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:59:56 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Valdis,

Thursday, December 11, 2003, 9:06:26 AM, you wrote:

VKve> However, it's a trivial matter to take the original text, the replacement text,
VKve> and compute an original such that the checksum comes out "the same".

Only this is a scenario where we don't have the "original text". If we
had, we could have just ripped out the sequence numbers and skipped
the whole problem.

As long as we don't know anything of the original data we have to
guess the correct checksum.

Still, 1 of 65535 is a lot better than... what is it, 2**64 ?


- --
Best regards,
 Marius                            mailto:mahuja () c2i net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQA/AwUBP9rjLJfZ2CSWpu1rEQIDnwCeI0wMODSSAJLgob1jSl+IDFw3uWMAoLhM
zR9zJ8TPn/0lOWXgJvBq2lZG
=CvFw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]