Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos network security services platform







Bugtraq: 802.11b DoS exploit

802.11b DoS exploit

From: Mark Osborne <mark_at_loud-fat-bloke.co.uk>
Date: 11 Mar 2003 22:26:32 -0000
('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
While working to develop code for WIDZ that is equivalent to a standard
Intrusion Detection system’s RESET or SHUN functionality, an effective
802.11b disruption of service attack has been discovered. I haven’t
spotted any other postings so here we go….

FATA-jack - a modified version of the Wlan-jack, Fata-jack sends an
Authentication-Failed packets (with a reason code of previous
authentication failed) to a Wireless client PC. The source and
destination macs have been spoofed so as to appear to come from the Access-
point. The original Wlan-jack code rate of transmission has been
significantly reduced to a meagre rate of 1 every 2.5 seconds, so as to
avoid any flood effect.

In limited tests on multiple operating systems including Windows98,
Windows ME and Linux, FATA-jack effectively tears down any active session
and in many cases causing the client driver or client software to fail
requiring a reboot.

Apart from being an extremely lethal DoS attack, FATA-jack is significant
for a number of reasons:

-As the transmission rate is very low, it is easy to see how a low-spec PC
and a standard 802.11 card could disable a large wireless network.

-As the malevolent packet are sent directly to the client these will not
picked-up by logging functionality on the AP (if you have any) – this
highlights the need for Wireless IDS.

-As the malevolent packets are spoofed AND sent directly to client MAC
protection or WEP protection will not prevent it.

-Some workmates have suggested that it could be used to cause IVs/WEP keys
to be cycled. This would significantly reduce the time for a WEP cracking
exercise. This is yet to be verified.

Received on Mar 11 2003
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]