mailing list archives
Re: Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity?
From: psz () maths usyd edu au (Paul Szabo)
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 05:11:12 +1000 (EST)
3APA3A <3APA3A () SECURITY NNOV RU> wrote:
-R 0 -s your_ad_can_be_here
Your cure is worse than the disease: rate limiting allows a DoS
against the service, no limit allows a DoS against the whole
-s limits number of processes invoked from same IP. You can additionally
use -c to prevent distributed attack. It doesn't allow to DoS box and
doesn't disable service for 10 minutes.
Note that my (DEC/Compaq/HP Tru64) inetd does not have -c or -s options.
The only safe way is to use a sensible -R and tcp_wrappers. Or upgrade to
Linux and xinetd...
Paul Szabo - psz () maths usyd edu au http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au:8000/u/psz/
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney 2006 Australia
- Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity?, (continued)