[ On Thursday, July 29, 2004 at 16:30:07 (+0300), Delian Krustev wrote: ]
Subject: Re: CVS woes: .cvspass
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 23:20, Greg A. Woods wrote:
Anyone using the CVS pserver mechanism for anything other than totally
anonymous access gets only what they deserve.
brr, do not forget that the security might be guaranteed on different
layers. E.g. ipsec secures the insecure protocols(the ones that transfer
data in plain text or with weak encryption), such as telnet or cvs
Nope, sorry, but that's just not possible, at least not with CVS pserver.
The unix security model, within which CVS is designed and implemented to
work, _requires_ unique user-IDs for each and every unique human user.
This is in fact a basic, fundamental, requirement of all systems of this
CVS is not, and cannot be, a security tool so running it as root and
pretending to have it do all your authentication and authorisation flies
directly in the face of the underlying system security model and leaves
you with no real and verifiable accountability whatsoever, and it also
leaves you open to the possibility of yet another vulnerability vector
in the form of the unaudited CVS code base. Remember that the vast
majority of all security incidents originate internally to the
organisations they affect.