|
Bugtraq
mailing list archives
Re: RFC: virus handling
From: Patrick Proniewski <patpro () patpro net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:24:52 +0100
On 28 janv. 2004, at 16:45, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
Looking at the current outbreak of the Mydoom.A worm I would like to
share and discuss some thoughts:
You bring some definitely interesting points here.
I agree with your 1) and 2), but 3) rises some technical concern
3.1.2.) e-mail Alias and Web-Interface
Additionally providers should provide e-mail aliases for the IP
addresses of their customers (eg. customer at 127.0.0.1 can be reached
via 127.0.0.1 () provider com) or a web interface with similiar
functionality. The latter should be provided when dynamically assigned
IP addresses are used for which an additional timestamp is required.
could be a really good idea, if not so easy to use for spammers or even
for virii. The moment you setup such a service, spammers/virus coder
will write a script that can reach every single user with an active
connexion. It's a really major drawback I think.
patpro
--
je cherche un poste d'admin-sys Mac/UNIX
(ou une jeune et jolie femme riche)
http://patpro.net/cv.php
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
Re: RFC: virus handling Piotr KUCHARSKI (Feb 02)
Re: RFC: virus handling Patrick Proniewski (Feb 02)
Re: RFC: virus handling Craig Morrison (Feb 02)
|