|
Bugtraq
mailing list archives
Re: RFC: virus handling
From: Dave Clendenan <dave () dave clendenan ca>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:09:05 -0800
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 02:00:03PM -0800, John Fitzgibbon wrote:
There is one standardized feature for virus and other bounce messages, (which
isn't mentioned in the original proposal), which I believe would really help:
A bounce should *always* include a MIME attachment of type
message/rfc822-headers which contains the full headers from the original
mail. This makes it relatively easy to check on the receiving side if the
original "Received: from" headers are valid, and simply drop bounces that
relate to messages that were originally sent with forged headers.
Outstanding idea. If you (or anyone else on the list) already have a
tested procmail recipe for this, please share. If not, let's make one
and share it around...
thanks
--
Dave Clendenan
dave () clendenan ca
PGP fingerprint: 910E 8400 7A16 822C 9B62 209F 6CAB DEDF BF4B DF75
Subtlety is the art of saying what you think,
and getting out of the way before it is understood
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: RFC: virus handling, (continued)
Re: RFC: virus handling Craig Morrison (Feb 02)
Re: RFC: virus handling John Fitzgibbon (Feb 02)
- Re: RFC: virus handling Dave Clendenan (Feb 03)
Re: RFC: virus handling Daniele Orlandi (Feb 02)
Re: RFC: virus handling Pavel Kankovsky (Feb 02)
Re: RFC: virus handling Dave Aronson (Feb 02)
RE: RFC: virus handling David Brodbeck (Feb 03)
|