<a href="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=clk&zid=14678&wd=728&ht=90&pair=as" target="_top"><img style="border:0px;" src="http://g.adspeed.net/ad.php?do=img&zid=14678&wd=728&ht=90&pair=as" alt="i" width="728" height="90"/></a>

Nmap Security Scanner

Docs
Security Lists

Full Disclosure

More
Security Tools

Packet crafters

More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:

edgeos network security services platform

Bugtraq: Lame crash in qmail-smtpd and memory overwrite according to gdb, yet still qmail much better than windows

Lame crash in qmail-smtpd and memory overwrite according to gdb, yet still qmail much better than windows

From: Serafino Sorrenti <ml_at_ssorrenti.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:48:00 +0100

http://www.guninski.com/qmailcrash.html

Georgi Guninski security advisory #65, 2004

Lame crash in qmail-smtpd and memory overwrite according to gdb, yet
still qmail much better than windows

Systems affected:
qmail 1.03 on linux, don't know about other OSes.

Risk: Unknown. maybe so, maybe no.
Date: 15 January 2004
Received on Jan 19 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Matt Zimmerman: "[SECURITY] [DSA 426-1] New netpbm-free packages fix insecure temporary file creation"
Previous message: Gadi Evron: "new outbreak warning - Bagle"
Next in thread: Scott Gifford: "Re: Lame crash in qmail-smtpd and memory overwrite according to gdb, yet still qmail much better than windows"
Maybe reply: Scott Gifford: "Re: Lame crash in qmail-smtpd and memory overwrite according to gdb, yet still qmail much better than windows"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]