|
Bugtraq
mailing list archives
Re: Hijacking Apache 2 via mod_perl
From: André Malo <nd () perlig de>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:42:28 +0100
* 3APA3A <3APA3A () SECURITY NNOV RU> wrote:
You're right: mod_perl is inside apache memory space and can access any
descriptor, so it's impossible to blame apache descriptor is leaked. But
you're wrong. mod_perl has access to memory, not perl script. At least,
it's possible to store descriptors table and implement check for
descriptor in every perl file/socket function inside mod_perl (and
mod_php and mod_something) and only allow access to std descriptors and
to descriptors open inside same script. The choice is between speed and
security.
Then one just writes a perl extension in C. Who's responsible then?
Who's responsible if you just write a C module which hijacks the
descriptors? Where do you draw the line?
nd
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
Re: Hijacking Apache 2 via mod_perl Lupe Christoph (Jan 22)
|