Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: Unprivilegued settings for FreeBSD kernel variables
From: "Eygene A. Ryabinkin" <rea () rea mbslab kiae ru>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:33:49 +0400

On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 09:01:13PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
I've already told you that there is no such threat, since the attack
you describe can only be initiated by someone who already has
unrestricted access.  Please stop wasting everybody's time.
 You are wrong. Unrestricted access means _really unrestricted_ and
kernel securelevel restricts access to certain places even to root.
IMHO, it's dagerous bug, because some administrators can think "...hmm,
I've enabled the hardest securelevel and even if a hacker would break
into my host with r00t privileges he will be restricted in certain ways.
The only thing he can do is to change /etc/rc.conf (for example) and
_reboot_ my host. But I will notice the reboot." So, for certain
people the following formulae may hold:
         Hardest securelevel + no reboots = good security.
 
 But this bug changes things. One can lower securelevel, do some nasty things
and raise it again _without reboots_. So, as I've already noted, you are wrong.
The bug _gives_ you almost unrestricted access.
        rea


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]