Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: Is predictable spam filtering a vulnerability?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 03:19:14 -0400

On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:52:00 +0200, Luca Berra <bluca () comedia it>  said:

I hold that after suitable training of the spam filter (this includes
generation of whitelists and such), dropping mail into oblivion is
perfectly safe.

Assume a spam filter that's 99.8% accurate.  This is probably a *high*
estimate - we're talking only 2 errors per every thousand mails...

Assume several million messages a day (which is *not* a very large load
by today's standards - we're merely a large university, and even *after*
subtracting spam and virus mail, we're in that range)...

Calculate how many mails get dropped into oblivion each day.

I suspect that you and I have differing definitions of "*perfectly* safe".....

Attachment: _bin
Description:


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]