Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: Buffer Overflow in ActivePerl ?
From: <noderat () hotmail com>
Date: 19 May 2004 04:10:49 -0000

In-Reply-To: <40AAB885.10935.31071242 () localhost>

Looks like full control of EIP...

However, there is not likely to be a privilege escalation here unless 
perhaps a script processor on a web server can be cajoled into doing 
something with this??  (Not at all familiar with the innards of Windows 
web servers and their relationship to their CGI, etc processors...)


-- 
Nick FitzGerald
Computer Virus Consulting Ltd.
Ph/FAX: +64 3 3529854



Unethical intruders don't always require "privilege escalation", executing code on another system is enough, depending 
on the goal.

Networks where say developers are sharing source tree's and the like, placing a hostile piece of code in the central 
store will allow remote code execution on the developer nodes.

Other registers other than EIP can be written, depending on the version, however we need not rely on EIP to allow for a 
buffer overflow exploit, we don't "need" to overwrite any register in fact to execute code, only to cause a buffer 
overflow  >;]

cheers


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]