Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords
From: Tino Wildenhain <tino () wildenhain de>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:06:37 +0200

Am Mittwoch, den 20.04.2005, 16:23 -0500 schrieb Jim C. Nasby:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:03:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
...
Simply put, MD5 is no longer strong enough for protecting secrets. It's
just too easy to brute-force. SHA1 is ok for now, but it's days are
numbered as well. I think it would be good to alter SHA1 (or something
stronger) as an alternative to MD5, and I see no reason not to use a
random salt instead of username.

I wonder where you want to store that random salt and how this would add
to the security.

-- 
Tino Wildenhain <tino () wildenhain de>


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]