Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

RE: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network?
From: "Michael Wojcik" <Michael.Wojcik () microfocus com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:27:51 -0800

From: Nate Eldredge [mailto:nge () cs hmc edu] 
Sent: Friday, 16 February, 2007 21:42

On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Darren Reed wrote:


Solaris's /bin/login has never supported the "-f" command line
option
until Solaris 10 (RTFM) so this exploit was just plain not possible.

That is not correct.  On a Solaris 8 box the -f option is accepted
without 
error.

Which does not show that it's "supported".  /bin/true accepts the -f
option, too.

I don't have root so I can't verify that it does the right thing,

You're using a Solaris 8 system with no entry in /etc/passwd for UID 0?
Extraordinary.
 
but at least as a normal user "login -f asdfasdf" does nothing

I haven't looked at the Solaris 10 login sources, but IIRC on AIX, this
bug required that the username be appended to the -f ("-froot", not "-f
root").

while "login" without arguments presents a prompt.

And what does "login -q asdfasdf" do?  What about "login -z asdfasdf"?

(I know what they do on a couple of older Solaris boxes I happen to
have, but I'll leave this as an exercise for the reader.)

-- 
Michael Wojcik
Principal Software Systems Developer, Micro Focus


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]