Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re[2]: Microsoft FTP Client Multiple Bufferoverflow Vulnerability
From: "Matthew Leeds" <mleeds () theleeds net>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:18:25 -0800

Given the past issues with .zip and .rar unpackers, unpacking an archive should be considered a risky activity. In some 
sense, opening, accessing, playing, or otherwise touching any file from an unknown source could be considered risky. 
The list of issues with media files, archive files, (or more accurately put, the applications that handle them) and the 
like is too long to recite, but informative.

----------
---Matthew
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 11/29/2007 at 6:09 PM Steve Shockley wrote:

Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
An attacker who can convince an user to extract a specially crafted
archive can overwrite arbitrary files with the permissions of the user
running gtar.  If that user is root, the attacker can overwrite any
file on the system.

Apparently, somebody at FreeBSD thinks "can be exploited if you trick the
user into doing something" is a valid attack vector.

The difference is that I'd be surprised when I got 0wned by unpacking an
archive, and not all that surprised when I got 0wned by running a random
executable (script) file.




  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]