Home page logo

bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: 0day: mIRC pwns Windows
From: "Gregory Rubin" <grrubin () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:47:47 -0700

I cannot reproduce this.

mIRC: 6.2
Outlook 2007 (fully patched)

Upon clicking the link, I get the following error message (from outlook):
"The command line argument is not valid.  Verify the switch you are using."


On 3 Oct 2007 16:06:29 -0000, jinc4fareijj () hotmail com
<jinc4fareijj () hotmail com> wrote:
Yipiya Ypipiya yah yeah. Here is a 0day! hurra mIRC pwns your Windozes! (ref. pdp)

send this to a user and make him double click on it (masquerade it with pink fore/background color and say 'free pr0n 
click here ->' it works all the time! damned perverts):

Now the question is, should we say *0day* for a bug in a core element that is WELL KNOWN by everyone (reported months 
ago), and will be patched, or should we try to get credits for finding a *vector* as pdp did with the supposed 
*acrobat reader pdf bug* ?

Fame kills bugs.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]