mailing list archives
Re: [Full-disclosure] COM Server-Based Binary Planting ProofOfConcept
From: Mitja Kolsek <mitja.kolsek () acros si>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:04:49 +0200
1) Are you sure a stock build of Windows doesn't pop a security
warning when right clicking the file:// IFRAME? You might have munged
your test OS.
IE allows you to right-click on a folder (but not on a file or on the
"background") inside a file:// iframe without popping up a security
warning. No idea why but it does.
2) You're getting closer with this "Send To" stuff, but you're still
socially engineering. Definitely better than classic "please download
and execute this file" though.
I personally think that the "click twice on this web page" exploit
that we released today requires even less social engineering than the
"Send to" one.
You really should stop talking about exploits against Powerpoint etc.
As long as I can make an .exe that visually looks pixel for pixel like
a .ppt, the security model you imagine (that the desktop can
differentiate between code execution and document editing) doesn't
I can partly agree with this for local attacks where attacker places a
malicious file - be it .ppt or .exe - somewhere on user's computer or
USB drive and get the user to double-click it. With a remote attack of
this type, Windows Explorer will issue a security warning if you
double-click an .exe on a remote share, but will let you double-click
a .ppt without such warning. It's hard to say what percentage of users
would actually be stopped by such warning but I'd consider it a part
of the security model.
Another case where a malicious .ppt lookalike executable would be
thwarted but binary planting may not be is with Windows Software
Restriction Policy or Windows AppLocker. In their default
configurations, both stop launching EXEs from untrusted locations, but
don't stop loading DLLs from arbitrary folders. So double-clicking on
a .ppt lookalike executable would be blocked, but a malicious DLL next
to a real .ppt file wouldn't be. But again, no idea as to how many/few
computers use this protection.
This work is better, if incomplete.
Security research is never complete, so we settle for constant improvement.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Mitja Kolsek <mitja.kolsek () acros si> wrote:
Thor, the "Online Proof of Concept" section of the blog post points
you to a *remote*
exploit (without any warning) but let me repeat the link here:
Visit this with IE8 on 32-bit Windows XP.
Please find further information here:
In general there are two types of remote binary planting exploits:
SMB and WebDAV.
The former works inside (local) networks where firewalls block
outbound SMB traffic.
WebDAV attacks work through firewalls too since many firewalls
allow outbound WebDAV
traffic and Windows silently fall back to WebDAV if SMB doesn't
work. If our online
remote exploit doesn't work for you, you can download the PoC
locally and test it in
your local network.
I'll be happy to explain it to you further if need be.
From: Thor (Hammer of God) [mailto:thor () hammerofgod com]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 6:00 PM
To: security () acrossecurity com; 'Dan Kaminsky'
Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk; bugtraq () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] COM Server-Based Binary
But it *is* worth mentioning that you have to create the
malicious dll file, copy it to the system, create folders
etc, and all the other mumbo jumbo to "exploit" this in the
"default configuration." So, the answer to Dan's question
is actually, "no, you can't." Which brings into question the
actual "worth" of mentioning this in the first place. :)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
> [mailto:full-disclosure- bounces () lists grok org uk] On
Behalf Of ACROS
> Security Lists
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 8:42 AM
> To: 'Dan Kaminsky'; security () acrossecurity com
> Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk; bugtraq () securityfocus com
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] COM Server-Based Binary
> It would hardly be worth mentioning otherwise.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
> > [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On
Behalf Of Dan
> > Kaminsky
> > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 5:36 PM
> > To: security () acrossecurity com
> > Cc: si-cert () arnes si; full-disclosure () lists grok org uk;
> > bugtraq () securityfocus com; cert () cert org
> > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] COM Server-Based Binary Planting
> > Proof OfConcept
> > Does this run code without prompting, on a reasonably default
> > configuration?
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:52 AM, ACROS Security Lists
> > <lists () acros si>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > We published a remote/local proof of concept for the COM
> > Server-Based
> > > Binary Planting exploit presented at the Hack in the Box
> > conference in Amsterdam.
> > >
> > > Feel free to try it out online if WebDAV works through your
> > firewall,
> > > or download it and test it in your local network or simply
> > on your computer.
> > >
> > >
> > ng
> > > -proof.html
> > > or
> > > http://bit.ly/iSxHKO
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Mitja Kolsek
> > > CEO&CTO
> > >
> > > ACROS, d.o.o.
> > > Makedonska ulica 113
> > > SI - 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
> > > tel: +386 2 3000 280
> > > fax: +386 2 3000 282
> > > web: http://www.acrossecurity.com
> > >
> > > ACROS Security: Finding Your Digital Vulnerabilities Before
> > Others Do
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/