Home page logo
/

bugtraq logo Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: Vulnerabilities in some SCADA server softwares
From: Jamie Riden <jamie.riden () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:43:35 +0000

The correct time for vendors to do their own homework on SCADA was
2003 - that was the wakeup call. Anyone who has programmed for SCADA
has always wondered what would happen if they started poking
undocumented values into undocumented registers, but may not have the
luxury of trying it out.

Having been a security/network admin, there are many things that can
be done when you know of a vulnerability - snort sigs, snort flexible
response (thanks Jeff!), firewall configs, etc. I've done them before
when vulns have been published before patches, and it is much better
knowing that something is up than not. Do not rely on your vendor to
keep you up to date on security issues.

cheers,
 Jamie

On 23 March 2011 18:36, J. Oquendo <sil () infiltrated net> wrote:
On 3/23/2011 2:13 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
If *any* threat exists,
that threat is increased by public exposure of unmitigated attack
methodology
I think you have it wrong.

Public exposure increases the visibility, and therefore customers
install the patches quicker.

Without public visibility, they will keep running the old code.

You're flawed in your response: "Public exposure increases the
visibility, and therefore customersinstall the patches quicker." ...
When someone "full discloses" a vulnerability, there is no patch to
install quicker. This is obvious because there is no patch until either
the vendor releases one, or staff using the product are capable of
creating a work-around. In the case of the SCADA environment, we (again)
are not talking about the potential of a defacement, blue screen, silly
shell, we're talking about sensor, gears and often so much automation
that it would be absurd for a SCADA engineer to "go it alone" and try
create their own patch. Many of these systems don't have the option of
failing or being taken offline. You also state: "Without public
visibility, they will keep running the old code" the reality is, no one
is going to outright replace some of these systems in these
environments. These are not applications and or systems one can plop
onto donated boxes. They have no choice BUT to run the code.

-- 
Jamie Riden / jamie () honeynet org / jamie.riden () gmail com
http://uk.linkedin.com/in/jamieriden


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]