Dailydave: Re: 0days

["Valery Marchuk" <tecklord () argocom cv ua>]

Sure
http://www.securitylab.ru/poc/275330.php
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dave Aitel 
  To: dailydave () lists immunitysec com 
  Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 4:39 AM
  Subject: [Dailydave] 0days


  Someone's finally keying in on the value of 0days for penetration testing (or, ya know, hacking). 

  Does anyone know where the PPT 2003 PoC was posted? 

  -dave



  http://news.com.com/The+future+of+malware+Trojan+horses/2100-7349_3-6125453.html?tag=nefd.lede 

  The future of malware
  The use of zero-day flaws circumvents traditional signature-based security products. These products rely on attack 
signatures (the "fingerprint" of the threat) to block the attack, which requires the attack to have been identified at 
least once before. 
  "This is the future of malware attacks," said Andreas Marx, an antivirus software specialist at the University of 
Magdeburg in Germany. "People affected by this won't be protected by antivirus software because there is no signature." 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Dailydave mailing list
  Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
  http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave

_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave