Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Dailydave: Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work?

Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work?

From: Chris Rohlf <chris.rohlf_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 09:44:12 -0500

Yes you would take certain pax permissions off applications that
require an executable stack (x.org, jvm come to mind).

But proper SElinux controls can still be applied to them. I was more
specifically looking for how to bypass those MAC and RBAC features of
SElinux and grsecurity without a kernel vulnerability.

Chris

On 3/2/07, endrazine <endrazine_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Chris Rohlf a écrit :
> > This sort of goes without saying. But what other known 'bypasses' are
> > there for grsec or SElinux that don't require a kernel vulnerability?
> > Im asking honestly, its been awhile since I've looked into this stuff.
> >
> Afaik, Pax, grsec etc do _never_ randomize Xorg.
>
>
> endrazine-

-- 
http://em386.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave_at_lists.immunitysec.com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Received on Mar 03 2007
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos