Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




dailydave logo Dailydave mailing list archives

Re: Is Windows Integrity Control in Vista really worth the performance hit? And does it really work?
From: "Chris Rohlf" <chris.rohlf () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 09:44:12 -0500

Yes you would take certain pax permissions off applications that
require an executable stack (x.org, jvm come to mind).

But proper SElinux controls can still be applied to them. I was more
specifically looking for how to bypass those MAC and RBAC features of
SElinux and grsecurity without a kernel vulnerability.

Chris

On 3/2/07, endrazine <endrazine () gmail com> wrote:
Chris Rohlf a écrit :
This sort of goes without saying. But what other known 'bypasses' are
there for grsec or SElinux that don't require a kernel vulnerability?
Im asking honestly, its been awhile since I've looked into this stuff.

Afaik, Pax, grsec etc do _never_ randomize Xorg.


endrazine-

-- 

http://em386.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Dailydave mailing list
Dailydave () lists immunitysec com
http://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]